> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Ummmm, This message is suggesting regressing function that once > > worked. This message says, break WebFolders, but tell people how > > to fix it, since we would finally be following the spec. What > > we have right now, is a bit broken, but it doesn't break WebFolders. > > So we are broken, and WebFolders are broken. Brilliant solution, > that, in which NO-one is doing it correctly. > > Bah. I say follow the RFC. Apache is a reference implementation > of HTTP, and should do so in any event. > -- And what do you do when a paying customer says 'hey, this function that 1000's of my customers depend on that used to work is now broken'? Tell them to look at the RFC? Decisions like this must always be made on a case-by-case basis. This one seems to be a case that we can accomodate with minimal impact on anything else. Bill
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Greg Stein
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir rbb
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Greg Stein
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod... rbb
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... rbb
- RE: over-aggressive redirecti... Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Bill Stoddard
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... rbb
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Bill Stoddard
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Jim Winstead
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Greg Stein
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Bill Stoddard
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Greg Stein
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... James A. Sutherland
- Re: over-aggressive redirecti... Dale Ghent
