> Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > > Bah. I say follow the RFC. Apache is a reference implementation > > > of HTTP, and should do so in any event. > > > > And what do you do when a paying customer says 'hey, this function > > that 1000's of my customers depend on that used to work is now > > broken'? > > Apache *has* no 'paying customers.' Too literal of an interpretation. Apache has users who rely on Apache to run their business. If we break them, who are we serving? The RFC god? > > > Decisions like this must always be made on a case-by-case basis. > > Sorry, I believe in doing the RIGHT thing, not the expedient one. > 'Be strict in what you send, liberal in what you accept.' The RIGHT thing is serving our user base. We ignore that fact at our peril. Bill
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Bill Stoddard
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir rbb
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Bill Stoddard
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Jim Winstead
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Greg Stein
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Roy T. Fielding
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Bill Stoddard
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Greg Stein
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir James A. Sutherland
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Dale Ghent
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir James A. Sutherland
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Greg Stein
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir James A. Sutherland
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Greg Stein
- Re: over-aggressive redirection in mod_dir Dale Ghent
