FWIW, peter Moore has just sent me more detail on the problem that BeOS seems to have with large files, and it looks like 1.1 has a problem whereas 1.0 is fine. Could be related to Brian's issue. I've asked him to follow up with more detail, but his email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to talk directly. The file that's barfing is the large image on http://bp6.cdws.com.au/bp6cpu.html (http://bp6.cdws.com.au/images/screen1.tga) Of course, given that both peter and Brian are in Australia, maybe it's just a southern hemisphere thing :) david > > Can you give me a sample set of request headers to try to duplicate this? > > I've tried it with a 128KB file with MMAP and SENDFILE both turned off > using HTTP/1.1 with and without chunking, and it still works on Linux. >
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12? Cliff Woolley
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12? Brian Havard
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12? Cliff Woolley
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0... Brian Havard
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0... rbb
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0... Brian Havard
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0... rbb
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0... Brian Havard
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0... Cliff Woolley
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12? Cliff Woolley
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0... David Reid
- Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12? Cliff Woolley
- canonical stuff (was: Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12?... Greg Stein
- Re: canonical stuff (was: Re: apache 2.0.11 - ta... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- unicode file APIs (was: Re: canonical stuff) Greg Stein
- Re: unicode file APIs (was: Re: canonica... dean gaudet
- Re: unicode file APIs (was: Re: cano... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: unicode file APIs (was: Re: cano... Sander van Zoest
