I'd vote to tweak some of the tags on those files Bill had issues with, then
roll a new tarball, and release it as an *alpha*.
It is certainly time, compared to 2.0a9.
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 03:12:12PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I assume that you mean 2.0.14. We are not ready to release a beta. We
> have the same issues with 2.0 on Unix that we had the last time we spoke
> about a beta. There are four outstanding issues in the STATUS file, and
> until those are cleared up, we are not ready for a beta.
>
> Ryan
>
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > since we rolled 1.3.14 on Wednesday, I'm itching to announce as a beta next
>Wednesday,
> > if noone encounters problems. The build issue on Win32 is minor, a patch is on the
> > website, and as it affect _no_ code, I'm tempted to roll those .mak and the one
>.dsp
> > change into the .zip ball before it moves to www.apache.org/dist/.
> >
> > If this offends anyone's sensibilities, please speak up. In any case, it's time
> > to identify and announce any major breakage between now and next Wednesday.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
