The original plan was to release the .14 tarballs as alpha tomorrow
morning. I do not want to rush this, because I want to give people a
chance to tell us there is a problem. If nobody reports a problem, I will
post them tomorrow morning sometime.
Ryan
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> I'd vote to tweak some of the tags on those files Bill had issues with, then
> roll a new tarball, and release it as an *alpha*.
>
> It is certainly time, compared to 2.0a9.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 03:12:12PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I assume that you mean 2.0.14. We are not ready to release a beta. We
> > have the same issues with 2.0 on Unix that we had the last time we spoke
> > about a beta. There are four outstanding issues in the STATUS file, and
> > until those are cleared up, we are not ready for a beta.
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > since we rolled 1.3.14 on Wednesday, I'm itching to announce as a beta next
>Wednesday,
> > > if noone encounters problems. The build issue on Win32 is minor, a patch is on
>the
> > > website, and as it affect _no_ code, I'm tempted to roll those .mak and the one
>.dsp
> > > change into the .zip ball before it moves to www.apache.org/dist/.
> > >
> > > If this offends anyone's sensibilities, please speak up. In any case, it's
>time
> > > to identify and announce any major breakage between now and next Wednesday.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________________
> > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 406 29th St.
> > San Francisco, CA 94131
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
