On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:22:32PM -0500, Blue Lang wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
>
> > Well, I didn't think about that, but having had to look thru the code
> > to make my submitted patch, I noticed more than one potential
> > improvements in the code. I think it's something I could manage to
> > 'tackle'
>
> you will find that 2.0 is not at all like 1.3.. apr contains a wrapper for
> all of the tmpfile naming stuff, so you can probably just steal that code
> out.
Oh, cool. I'll investigate a bit more this week-end
> there is one use of apr_mkstemp in 2.0 already, altho it's a wee bit
> byzantine.
Hrm, guess it's time I start looking at 2.0 code closely again. It's
always fun anyways.
Still not 100% sure how to proprely detect the presense of mkstemp() for
1.3 without hacking away at the configure scripts...any hints?
>
> --
> Blue Lang http://www.gator.net/~blue
> 2315 McMullan Circle, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA 919 835 1540
>
>
--
+-----------------------------------------------+
| Philippe M. Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| SmartWorker http://www.smartworker.org |
| IM : gozerhbe ICQ : gozer/18279998 |
| 64.8% computer corrupt according to |
| http://www.freespeech.org/ljk/purity.html |
+-----------------------------------------------+
That's okay. Anyone whose opinion he cares about already
knows that he doesn't care about their opinion.
-- Larry Wall
perl -e '$$=\${gozer};{$_=unpack(P26,pack(L,$$));/^Just Another Perl
Hacker!\n$/&&print||$$++&&redo}'
PGP signature
