On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:20:47PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Should mod_file_cache simply punt if neither APR_HAS_SENDFILE nor
> > APR_HAS_MMAP is available?
>
> punt as in "#error mod_file_cache only works on systems with
> APR_HAS_SENDFILE and APR_HAS_MMAP" ?
That might be a bit heavy, but I'm not opposed to that plan.
At a minimum, just have the module not register its hooks.
> > Does the module provide useful service without
> > either of those? (e.g. caching open file handles?)
>
> not currently
Ah. Then definitely insert something. Otherwise, it would seem that we might
erroneously attempt to cache something, when we don't even support caching
:-) Or, at least, give the impression that caching is available when it
really isn't.
Oh. Hmm. #error is the best. We don't want a non-functional module in there,
with directives available, thus misleading a person that the functionality
is available.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
