Re: [PATCH] mod_proxy Keepalives

[Bill Stoddard]

> IMO...
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 03:18:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >...
> > My real point was that if new conn_rec(s) of any description are appearing
> > somewhere in standard Apache then there is more chance for breakage in
> > IBMHTTPD because their conn_rec is not the same.
>
> Breakage in IBMHTTPD is NOT our concern. We will implement whatever and
> however we want in Apache. We are doing what is Best, which doesn't equate
> to never changing the API.
>
> If they want to patch conn_rec, then it is their problem to deal with
> breakage.
>

Yep, that's exactly right.  Kevin, if you have specific concerns, you have my e-mail 
address. This
doesn't need to be on the mailing list.

Bill