> From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:56 PM > > > > I have not reviewed Paul's patch but he and I have discussed it and I am +1 on concept. > > Having the main thread join the workers at shutdown ensures that the main thread >will not > > exit before all the workers have exited. Not unlike what I am doing in the windows mpm > > with waitformultipleobject. > > Agreed! Note that I'm only concerned that it's sufficiently abstracted to > be implemented across platforms, not just for unix. > > > Our policy is commit the review. > > Agreed! Just as long as all recognize the semantics might change a bit :-) > Yep, code exists to be changed (or removed :-) Bill
- Need access to apr_sigwait from threaded mpm. Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from threaded mpm... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from threaded... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from thre... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from ... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_sigw... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait ... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Need access to apr_sigw... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait ... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_sigw... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from thre... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from ... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait ... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_sigw... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_... Bill Stoddard
