On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: > I have not reviewed Paul's patch but he and I have discussed it and I am +1 on >concept. > Having the main thread join the workers at shutdown ensures that the main thread >will not > exit before all the workers have exited. Not unlike what I am doing in the windows >mpm > with waitformultipleobject. > > Our policy is commit the review. Yes, but this approach was taken a long time ago, and I am uncomfortable going back to it until we know why it was removed back then. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Need access to apr_sigwait from threaded mpm. Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from threaded mpm... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from threaded... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from thre... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from ... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_sigw... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait ... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Need access to apr_sigw... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait ... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_sigw... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from thre... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait from ... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_sigwait ... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_sigw... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_... rbb
- Re: Need access to apr_... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Need access to apr_... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Need access to apr_... Greg Ames
