Chuck Murcko wrote: > > I wanted to let things settle down a bit before popping this one, but > with DSO, HTTP protocol, and multiprotocol changes on the way I think > it's a good time. Plus the multiprotocol thread. > +1 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody."
- [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? rbb
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Bill Stoddard
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Blue Lang
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Greg Stein
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in... David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in... Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in... David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in... Jim Jagielski
