David Reid wrote: > > Isn't that what we're already doing with APR and APR-Util? They are > standalone projects but when you get a tarball of apache it has them > included. Wouldn't this be a useful idea for proxy and rewrite as well? OB > and I are on the same page about this just using different words :) > > david > Agreed. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody."
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Blue Lang
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Greg Stein
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Greg Stein
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Bill Stoddard
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? rbb
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
