[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 

> > Wait a second, our user configured the server so that the child process
> > never terminates.  That's what our docs say that directive does.  This
> > says, well, we just take a really long time to terminate.  Either the
> > patch needs to be backed out, or the docs need to change.  I personally
> > would rather keep the 0 meaning the child process never dies.
> 
> I should clarify quickly, I have stated a preference, but I will be
> perfectly happy as long as either the docs change or the code does.
> 

Dude...think about it in practical terms for a sec.  How long will it
take for a given process to server 2G requests?  and what bad thing will
the admin notice?  

(i.e. why bother?)

Greg

Reply via email to