> +1 on this patch, reason being...
>
> we have a bunch of confusion over the port/listen directives. I believe this
> patch is headed in the right direction.
>
> We NEED to depreciate the old Port behavior. It is terribly confusing to folks
> to change their port, and have nothing happen.
>
> Listening should be through a Listen directive, alone. A few folks need to
> change the .conf file, but this is 2.0, so everyone will be changing their
> .conf file for varied reasons.
>
> By assuming port 80, we make the user believe that the Port directive is actually
> in control of something. Of course, it's not.
>
> Let's get the pain over with, finally. If they forget Listen, then don't make
> assumptions for them.
How would you solve the problem of having the server listen on one port,
but report that it is listening on another?
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
