On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There were a lot of changes since that tag was laid. I wouldn't have a > problem just retagging that file if we had done everything in a few hours, > and nothing else had been committed. Since it took a few days, I do not > believe this is a good idea. We are better off just tagging as 2.0.20, > IMNSHO. Yes, definitely go to 2.0.20. Besides the other changes that have gone in since .19, .19 was announced to current-testers when it was rolled... no sense adding to the confusion by having two .19's. Numbers are cheap. =-) --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Jim Jagielski
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Greg Ames
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Ben Laurie
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/th... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/thread... Greg Ames
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded t... Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded threaded.c rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded threa... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded t... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/thread... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/th... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/m... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Paul J. Reder
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Paul J. Reder
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Paul J. Reder
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded threaded.c Cliff Woolley
