On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yes, definitely go to 2.0.20. Besides the other changes that have gone in > > since .19, .19 was announced to current-testers when it was rolled... no > > sense adding to the confusion by having two .19's. Numbers are cheap. > > =-) > > I'm not rolling until the current problem with the intraprocess locks is > fixed. I'll try to get to it soon-ish. If somebody wants to beat me to > it, feel free. Please hold off on tagging until tomorrow so I can have some time to test, particularly mod_file_cache... --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded threaded.c rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded threa... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded t... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/thread... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/th... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/m... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Paul J. Reder
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Paul J. Reder
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... Paul J. Reder
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/serv... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded threaded.c Cliff Woolley
