On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, dean gaudet wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > > static file local threaded: > > > > No keepalives Keepalives > > -------------------------- ---------------------------- > > no cache 154.54 req/s 879.06 KB/s 2432.63 req/s 13924.84 KB/s > > CacheFile 155.53 req/s 881.38 KB/s 2556.91 req/s 14581.54 KB/s > > MMapFile 155.03 req/s 878.55 KB/s 2660.11 req/s 15170.08 KB/s > > so forgive my ignorance of apache 2.0... do any of these represent > sendfile() without userland caching? 'cause that should be the fastest > static file serving method on linux 2.4.x. The first one does. I ran each test a few times to make sure that the results came out more or less the same each time, which they did. (I'm on 2.4.3, if that matters.) --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
- mod_file_cache performance Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache performance Bill Stoddard
- Re: mod_file_cache performance William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: mod_file_cache performance Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache performance dean gaudet
- Re: mod_file_cache performance Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache performance dean gaudet
- Re: mod_file_cache performance Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache performance Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache performance dean gaudet
- Re: mod_file_cache performance Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache performa... Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... dean gaudet
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... dean gaudet
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... dean gaudet
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... Victor J. Orlikowski
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... Sander van Zoest
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... dean gaudet
- Re: mod_file_cache perf... Cliff Woolley
