Re: Extraneous socket read?

[Brian Pane]

dean gaudet wrote:

>
>On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
>
>>So I guess the ideal algorithm for retrieving the initial request
>>from a client is:
>>
>>  OS with working TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT or equivalent: select first, then read
>>  OS without working TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT or equivalent: read first
>>
>
>isn't it the other way around?
>
Yes; I transposed the rules for the two cases.  What I should have said was:
  OS with working TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT or equivalent: read first
  OS without working TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT or equivalent: select first

--Brian