Re: Extraneous socket read?

[dean gaudet]

On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, dean gaudet wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> > Humm... If you use TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, how to you handle clients
> > connecting but not sending any bytes?
>
> i'm not sure what happens if they connect and close before the timeout.

the socket is passed to accept() and you read() an EOF immediately... just
like we'd like to see.

also, it appears the timeout is broken (or i'm using it wrong)... awaiting
word from kernel gurus.

-dean