On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Sander Striker wrote: > > Fair enough. It's just that in order to opt-out of the child-pool creating > > process in apr_thread_create, we're going to have to add a parameter > > Why are we so desperate in opting out the child-pool creation? > I don't really have problems with a child pool for each thread. Actually, > it will make the dynamic locking a lot easier to implement if it stays. The reality is that it should stay. The problem we have right now, is that httpd creates a thread-pool, and then APR creates one. So, if httpd didn't create one, and just used the one APR created automatically, this problem would go away completely. Ryan _____________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Seperating cleanups from memory allo... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE: [PAT... rbb
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE:... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE:... Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE:... Aaron Bannert
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Sander Striker
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Aaron Bannert
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Sander Striker
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... rbb
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Aaron Bannert
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WA... rbb
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WA... dean gaudet
- request_rec question Brian Pane
- Re: request_rec question rbb
- Re: request_rec question Ian Holsman
- Re: request_rec question rbb
- Re: request_rec question dean gaudet
- Re: request_rec question Brian Pane
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... rbb
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... William A. Rowe, Jr.
