On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 08:33:09PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: [snip] > p.s. maybe this example will help highlight why apr_lock_t is far too > generic and there should be a more lightweight thread only mutex that > doesn't require lots of extra memory allocation? Oh don't get me started on that again... ;) I'd LOVE to get some really lightweight (intraprocess) mutexes into APR... Something akin to true POSIX mutexes would be fantastic. -aaron
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WAS: RE... Sander Striker
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WA... dean gaudet
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... dean gaudet
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Seperating cleanups from memory allocati... Sander Striker
- Re: Seperating cleanups from memory allo... dean gaudet
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE:... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE: [PAT... rbb
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE:... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE:... Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE:... Aaron Bannert
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Sander Striker
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Aaron Bannert
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Sander Striker
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... rbb
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, WA... Aaron Bannert
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, WA... rbb
