On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:23:05AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > Unless somebody objects, I will commit my latest patch to the threaded MPM later >this weekend. > This is the patch that implements a multi-process single acceptor/multi-worker model. +1. What's going to happen with condition variables? Just rely on pthread_cond_wait, etc? Whenever any of us get around to having condition variables in APR, we can take it out and use APR's instead rather than using pthread_cond directly. -- justin
- Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker William M. Perry
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Greg Ames
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Jeff Trawick
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Jeff Trawick
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
