On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:53:40PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote: > I object. Threaded is a mess as it stands now, with multiple new > processes allowed to grab the same chuck of scoreboard. We need to fix > that before destabilizing it further. Maybe we should disable threaded MPM in a 2.0.22 tarball by default? I think we all agree it needs major work. We don't need more feedback to tell us that the threaded MPM is a mess. I'm kind of thinking that it would be easier to toss the current threaded MPM code and come up with a brand new one that addresses all of the issues. (The threaded MPM code is spaghetti for those who haven't dared to look at it recently.) -- justin
- Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker William M. Perry
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Greg Ames
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Jeff Trawick
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Jeff Trawick
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Greg Ames
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Greg Ames
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Single listener - multi-worker Ryan Bloom
