"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> Looks like a bug useing apr_vrformatter ... Cody's patch, perhaps?
hmmm, that did change recently. I don't know how it ties into the rest
of the *printf* stuff, or if the apparent recursion below makes any
sense, or why I should see so many "??"s in the bt. I'm making slow
progress with the mod_include FAQ-x problem, and will stick to that for
now.
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x40009a61 in ?? ()
> > #1 0x4000d360 in ?? ()
> > #2 0x4000d510 in ?? ()
> > #3 0x401160fe in ?? ()
> > #4 0x4014fb68 in ?? ()
> > #5 0x0808fd19 in apr_palloc (a=0x80e4c74, reqsize=1024) at
> > apr_pools.c:1100
> > #6 0x0808fea2 in apr_pool_userdata_get (data=0x80c0a0c, key=0x80c0a0c
> > "",
> > cont=0xbffff638) at apr_pools.c:1222
> > #7 0x0808ff00 in psprintf_flush (vbuff=0x80c0a0c) at apr_pools.c:1289
> > #8 0x0808fe8c in apr_pool_userdata_get (data=0x80be9fc,
> > key=0x400 <Address 0x400 out of bounds>, cont=0xbffff65c)
> > at apr_pools.c:1221
> > #9 0x0808ff00 in psprintf_flush (vbuff=0x80be9fc) at apr_pools.c:1289
> > #10 0x08067d15 in usage (process=0x80bea74) at main.c:258
> > #11 0x08068425 in get_addresses (p=0x1, w_=0xbffff754 "����",
> > paddr=0xbffff75c, default_port=134600058) at vhost.c:220
> > #12 0x4013f0de in ?? ()
> >
