Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm gonna take a short break then write a perl CGI to put the tag at
> > specified offsets, run it for i = 0 to very-large-number, and if I
> > don't get any parsing errors I'll commit it.
>
> cool... with 8187 blanks in front of the tag we barf
The only problem I can recreate with my second patch (uncommitted) is
at offset n*8192+8187... after looking at it briefly, it would seem
that the n*8192+8187 problem is the fault of find_start_sequence()
(i.e., unrelated to the code I've tweaked)
I'll commit the second patch now and try to make progress on
n*8192+8187 before I have to stop.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
