On Sunday 01 December 2002 04:17 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote: > On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:42:09 -0600 > > Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, I see what your saying, but don't understand what problem this > > causes, There was not much extra on the header to eat up band width or > > anything. Breach of netiquette? Please enlighten me on this subject, I'm > > not sure but might have done the same in the past. > > Yes. > It is a breach of netiquette and a bothersome detractor. > > I and many other users set their mail clients to sort and view by thread. > The mail agent does this using the mail ID- > 001a01c298bd$52038b00$48382d44@racerpup from the initial post which is > tagged to all mails sent as Reply. Changing the subject will not change or > remove this ID. > You just end up in this case with several post about stopping pop-ups > included in a thread about updating the kernel. > > > Charles > > ---------------- > In seeking the unattainable, simplicity only gets in the way. > -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982 > ---------------------- > Charles A Edwards > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------- Got it, I sort threads by subject so never noticed this happening, I will make sure in the future to use my address book click and click again to start a new subject and not use reply. Sorting is messy enough as it is. : P -- Dennis M. linux user # 180842
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
