On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 02:53, et wrote:
> On Saturday 15 February 2003 04:32 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > >> I'd tend to reckon because MDK is being designed and marketed as a
> > >> desktop distro instead of a server distro - hence the emphasis on
> > >> desktop stuff and not on dev stuff or server security stuff...but that's
> > >> on my eyeballs...
> >
> > True.  But there are still some security measures that you would want to be
> > able to take.
> > Win2k/XP/etc has IIS installed on them to be servers.....
> > Rob
> 
> 
> Win2k/XP/etc has IIS installed on them to be servers....do you consider this a 
> good thing? or a secure thing?
> 

M$ did this for "web sharing" and the likes - and to give "workstations"
the ability to have/host their own stuff - but overall, given the record
and design of IIS, I don't think it's a good thing at all - it's like a
"carrot dangling in front of" their users. A bad carrot. A rotting nasty
carrot that might LOOK good but carries with it way too many problems
and tastes bad in the end.

Imagine (as I've already witnessed) a bug aimed at IIS, and it
penetrates a corporate environment where you have mostly NT 4.0
workstations and Win2k workstations and many of them have the IIS crap
not only turned ON (or installed) but are being used by the employees
for testing and for other silly things (aside from the fact that they're
all sharing drives and the likes) - and in comes the bug, and whammo!
Each and every one of them is down down down down - and their segment on
the network is so saturated that their cable has to be yanked from the
FDDI - then you have to go through each and every machine and not just
turn off IIS, but clean the damn thing to boot, and then take away
administrative privileges for all the users (explaining to departments
heads as to why every few minutes)...

Not a nice picture - and I've had to be faced with it more than five
times already...(MCI in Richardson, TX was a nightmare network
environment - they still have token-ring in some areas, BTW)
 
-- 
Sun, 16 Feb 2003 07:55:01 +1100
  7:55am  up 14:45,  4 users,  load average: 0.72, 0.22, 0.32
------------------------------------------------------------------
|            __    __          | kuhn media australia            |
|           / ,, /| |'-.       | http://kma.0catch.com           |
|          .\__/ || |   |      |=================================|
|       _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'      | stephen kuhn                    |
|      | /  \__.`=._) (_       |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|      |/ ._/  |"""""""""|     |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    |
|      |'.  `\ |         |     |    icq: 5483808                 |
|      ;"""/ / |         |     |                                 |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.-------.|     | mobile: 0410-728-389            |
|      '  `-`' "         "     | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU   |
------------------------------------------------------------------
 linux user:267497 * RH 8.0 * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting
------------------------------------------------------------------

        We don't claim Interactive EasyFlow is good for anything -- if you
think it is, great, but it's up to you to decide.  If Interactive EasyFlow
doesn't work: tough.  If you lose a million because Interactive EasyFlow
messes up, it's you that's out the million, not us.  If you don't like this
disclaimer: tough.  We reserve the right to do the absolute minimum provided
by law, up to and including nothing.
        This is basically the same disclaimer that comes with all software
packages, but ours is in plain English and theirs is in legalese.
        We didn't really want to include any disclaimer at all, but our
lawyers insisted.  We tried to ignore them but they threatened us with the
attack shark at which point we relented.
                -- Haven Tree Software Limited, "Interactive EasyFlow"

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to