On Sunday 20 July 2003 01:26 am, Erylon Hines wrote:
> upper management was at fault because they knew, and in fact had been
> warned on numerous occasions, that the restaurant's policy of brewing
> coffee at 180 degrees (F) was creating an unsafe condition.
I'm not being a smart-alec here, but how much of a burn difference is there
between 140 and 180?
I mean, would the jury have decided they weren't accountable if the person was
burned at 140?
--
/\
Dark><Lord
\/
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
