On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 02:01:50 -0400 "Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2003 01:26 am, Erylon Hines wrote: > > > upper management was at fault because they knew, and in fact had been > > warned on numerous occasions, that the restaurant's policy of brewing > > coffee at 180 degrees (F) was creating an unsafe condition. > > I'm not being a smart-alec here, but how much of a burn difference is there > between 140 and 180? > > I mean, would the jury have decided they weren't accountable if the person was > burned at 140? 140 deg once its served will rapidly cool to about 120 deg this is hot but not hot enough to scald you(defins a 2nd deg. burn !80 Deg will raise blisters > > -- > > /\ > Dark><Lord > \/ > > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
