On Friday August 29 2003 08:56 pm, David E. Fox wrote:
> > So they've changed their minds then... surprise, surprise...
> >
> > http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/08/29/1062050642514.html
>
> hahahahahaa
>
>
> Now it's our turn. Isn't false presentment of legal action where
> no action is contemplated actionable in an of itself? I work in a
> collections company and it's possible for our company to be sued
> if we tell a person we are going to take a certain action and not
> have an intent of pursuing that action.
>
> If they've attempted (using that letter) to create a
> debtor-consumer relationship vis a vis the linux community or
> corporate users, SCO may have violated the law.
That's what SCO said Friday mornin, later in the day they
changed their tune ... again
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11273
--
Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
