The visionary Opera develops rather slowly but the finished product is
worth the wait. The earliest versions were small and relatively stable
in the M$ inviron but had very limited accessories.
Judging from my past experience with Opera, I'd say if interested users
wrote to inquire about the status of Linux browser a polite response
would be received.
PJ
M Thompson wrote:
>
>They may have done a cost analysis and decided that is wasn't worth it. I hope the
>swell of Linux users will change their minds.
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [[newbie] MS Internet Explorer]
> >Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 20:45:30 -0400
> >
> >On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 06:10:33PM -0700, Richard Salts wrote:
> >From a post I read I understand that Opera has been working on
> >versions of its browser for two other platforms: BE and Mac.
> >Perhaps that accounts for the great delay for Linux.
> >
> >They've hired outside teams for each of the ports, so it doesn't do
> >much to explain the problems. If I remember correctly, the Be port > >was even
>started _after_ the Linux port!
> >
> >Steve Philp
> >Network Administrator
> >Advance Packaging Corporation
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
