On Wednesday 07 April 2004 05:20 pm, et wrote: > On Wednesday 07 April 2004 01:20 pm, Richard Urwin wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 Apr 2004 7:44 am, Job Evers wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 15:23:38 -0400 > > > > > > JoeHill wrote: > > > > Anyhow, IQ tests are unreliable, culturally and socio-economically > > > > biased, and not necessarily an indication of true intelligence. > > > > > > I especially love the 'IQ tests' online. They range from answer 12 > > > stupid questions (after a couple of tries its pretty easy to get all > > > 12 right :-)) to the really long super hard pattern recognition > > > tests. > > > > The one I liked the most just kept asking questions until you gave up, > > and then reported your IQ based on how long it took you to realise that > > it wasn't going to stop. (Sorry, I don't have a link.) > > > > This one's a bit of fun (doesn't measure IQ though) > > http://www.soronlin.org.uk/geekquiz.html > > > > I learnt a lot of Javascript doing it too. > > > > > > Mine's 136 :-D > > > > hmm... 136D > > I hope that's metric. > > > > > Never taken a real one. I've scored anywhere between 110 on some > > > stupid british test (cultural bias) to 180 on one of those 12 > > > question tests :-) > > > > Mine's 148 = 2 standard deviations, as measured by Mensa. (ie I squeeked > > in). > > has it ever occurred to your Mensa group, that if you are smart enough to > be in Mensa, you really ought to be smart enough to consider anything > elitist to be morally wrong?
and it occurs to me if I am stupid enough to post, shouldn't I be at least bright enough to use the speell checker > > It's 110 as measured by a stupid British TV show. -- linux counter #167806
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
