On Wednesday 07 April 2004 12:20, Richard Urwin wrote: > On Tuesday 06 Apr 2004 7:44 am, Job Evers wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 15:23:38 -0400 > > > > JoeHill wrote: > > > Anyhow, IQ tests are unreliable, culturally and > > > socio-economically biased, and not necessarily an indication of > > > true intelligence. > > > > I especially love the 'IQ tests' online. They range from answer 12 > > stupid questions (after a couple of tries its pretty easy to get > > all 12 right :-)) to the really long super hard pattern recognition > > tests. > > The one I liked the most just kept asking questions until you gave > up, and then reported your IQ based on how long it took you to > realise that it wasn't going to stop. (Sorry, I don't have a link.) > > This one's a bit of fun (doesn't measure IQ though) > http://www.soronlin.org.uk/geekquiz.html > > I learnt a lot of Javascript doing it too. > > > > Mine's 136 :-D > > hmm... 136D > I hope that's metric. > > > Never taken a real one. I've scored anywhere between 110 on some > > stupid british test (cultural bias) to 180 on one of those 12 > > question tests :-) > > Mine's 148 = 2 standard deviations, as measured by Mensa. (ie I > squeeked in). It's 110 as measured by a stupid British TV show. geez I thought TV lowered IQ by at least 50. -- Regards; Hoyt
Ignore the past and you will fail! Ignore the future and you have already failed!
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
