On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:03:40 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote about Re: [newbie] KGPG:
>I think it has more to do with the massage passing through the mailing >list. It changes a couple of things, like the replyto address. It may >also change something in the body of the message. Any changes to the >body of the message make the signiture invalid. > >Mikkel I have seen this claimed even by the most experienced Linux users around on any of the sympa lists, but how can it be explained that I have never encountered one message returned to me by any of the sympa lists that had an invalid signature? And I did check them all. :)) Cheers, =Dick Gevers=
pgpE44738WfjO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
