KMail is great! It's GUI is intuitive, and its overall feel is fantastic.
I've always felt that Netscape's mail was sluggish. I much prefer Kmail.
> Recently, I beilieve it was linux journal that gave kmail a very high
> reveiew as a linux mail client. I have tryed it out and i feel that it is at
> least on par with netscape mail if not better.
>
>
> >From: Cindy Bartorillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: [newbie] Re: Mail Program
> >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:09:08 -0400
> >
> >Tom Brinkman wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Most, including myself, believe NS is still the most viable
> > > browser currently available for Linux. Also that the best way to
> > > avoid problems it still has, is to not use it for mail and news.
> >
> >Do you, or does anyone else here, have a recommendation for a good mail
> >program that can handle large amounts of graphics and html mail, and with a
> >strong filtering feature? I've spent the past week playing with mail
> >programs and have yet to find one better than that included with Netscape,
> >which is kinda sad.
> >
> >I believe both Pronto! and Mahogany support graphical mail, but I can't get
> >either one working. I get mired in Perl error messages with Pronto! and
> >Mahogany is just inscrutable. I've passed it around the office here and
> >nobody has been able to understand how to set that program up (and usually
> >mail programs are dead simple--answer 3 or 4 questions and you're off).
> >Anyway, it's frustrating.
> >
> >Pine of course has always been the most powerful mail program for Linux,
> >and
> >I used it religiously years ago, but nowadays a text-only program just
> >isn't
> >sufficient.
> >
> >CindyB
> >
> >
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
