On Saturday 06 January 2001 11:24 am, you wrote:

you know kicq is already installed when you first installed Mandrake 7.2.  It 
just isnt listed anywhere in the menus.   its' in the /usr/bin directory.  At 
first I thought it wasnt installed, so I took a look around at various site 
to see about Kicq.  The next thing I knew when I browsed through the bin 
directory and there is was kicq.  How weird,  after all this time I never had 
a clue that kicq was already installed.  I just dont understand why isnt it 
in the Kmenu.

Rob

> I did that.
> at first it complained about not having icqlib, so I go get icqlib,
> install it and then the configure script executes just dandy as I
> stated.
>
> Still got the message described below.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Weaver
> > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 9:30 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [newbie] kicq2.0.0b1 make
> >
> >
> > yeah...how about just plain old  ./configure  ?
> >
> > --
> > Mark
> > ###############
> > ## ...it's not a bug, it's a feature
> > ## Registered Linux User # 182496
> > ##  <!-- Pine 4.31 -->
> > #####################################
> >
> > On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 Carl Lafferty spake passionately saying:
> > > Got the 2.0.0.b1 tar.gz of kicq as well as the new icqlib that
> > > goes with it.  the icqlib compiled/installed perfectly and now
> > > my configure script runs just dandy..  However when I run make
> > > I get the following error.
> > >
> > > [carl@starfury ~/kicq-2 .0.0b1]$ make
> > > cd . && make -f admin/Makefile.common configure.files
> > > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/carl/kicq-2 .0.0b1'
> > > make[1]: *** [configure.files] Error 1
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/carl/kicq-2 .0.0b1'
> > > make: *** [configure.files] Error 2
> > >
> > > Any ideas for a fix would sure help!!

Reply via email to