Ok, my question is could someone point me to dirrections on how to pach the Kernel for 7.2? Or better yet, send out to the list the instructions? :) Thanx -Dru ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 1:05 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] Re: Win4Lin (was Recruitment Notice) > I run Win4Lin v2.0 on my Caldera eD2.4 using win98SE and it purrs and is > really fast. I did try VMWare back at version 2.0 and it was as slow as can > be (I only had 64MB of ram and now I have 160, but installed win4lin 1.04 @ > only 96 MB of ram, then win4lin 2.0 @ the same 96 MB). I mainly use this to > avoid dual booting. The sounds works as advertised and if I was not looking > at the monitor, I would think I'm booting native win98SE. I'm not sure why > one would say win4lin sucks, unless of course you're upset at having to patch > your own kernel to use Mandrake 7.2. I think VMWare sucks, but I will not put > it down, Linux rocks so any software emulator that works is alright with me, > I just prefer Win4Lin, can't wait till the server version comes out. Goodbye > to Windose. > > Keith > Northern VA, USA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Mark Weaver wrote: > > > > > > Dude! Win4Lin sucks big time! > > > > > > On 8 Jan 2001 19:00:08 EST, C.T.K. said: > > > > > > > By any chance, will LM 7.X or 8 contain Netraverse or Win4Lin > > enhancements? > > > > curious. what are some of your complaints with Win4Lin? is this > > version 1 patch 4 that you are referring to, or version 2? > > > > i run Win4Lin on another RedHat box, and it runs fine for our main > > purpose, which is to access a legal software written for Windows. as > > long as i uninstall alot of bloated stuffs that comes with win98, it > > runs tolerably fast. i do hate how everytime i clear the recycle bin, > > it comes up with an error message that amounts to nothing. i hate how > > the drive letters are arranged, because it can cause all sorts of > > confusion for other newbies. i run version 1, and i hate how there is > > no sound support, which means there are some training software i can't > > run on it at the moment. > > > > has anyone tried vmware? i heard it's slightly slower, but how else > > does it compare to win4lin? i'm particularly interested to know whether > > it shares the peculiar problems with Win4Lin version 1. how does > > version 2 compare to version 1? > > > > aston > > sydney, australia > > > > >
