The incredibly poor grammar and egregious spelling (in)ability
was far worse than the autoreply, which is saying a lot...
--- rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for the poor spelling and improper grammar (it's=it is,
> as an
> example). Spam can be dealt with. Incorrigibles cannot.
>
> Rob
>
> On Monday 26 February 2001 21:56, you wrote:
> > I don't really know which is more annoying-----the
> autoreply, or the
> > poor spelling.
> >
> > Cyber Sam wrote:
> > > You my knowledge, having an autoreply assigned to my email
> is not
> > > spamming, if in the opinion of the moderators of this list
> it is
> > > considered spam, I should let you know that I run a legal
> business on
> > > the web that requires that my customers get a timely reply
> to all of
> > > there queries.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have had my legal department look at what constitutes
> 'SPAM' and in
> > > there opinion, since the autoreply does not imply or
> solicited you to
> > > do anything, only supplies information, it can not be
> legally
> > > considered 'SPAM'.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you do not like the fact that my company has an
> autoreply assigned
> > > to it's email, you have the choice of filtering it out, or
> ignoring
> > > it. Reporting it to the anti-spam groups will not cause me
> to change
> > > how I or how thousands of other businesses do business in
> the net.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
