On Friday 22 June 2001 07:31 pm, Michael Leone wrote:
> > No. There's no permissions in Winblows, which is one reason
> > it's so inherently insecureable. M$ uses those attributes (ie,
> > hidden and
>
> Windows most certainly has file permissions. Or have you never looked
> at WinNT or Win2K? Check out ACLs on an NTFS volume sometime.
>
> Don't make the mistake of thinking that Win9x/WinME are the entire
> Windows line of products.
Mea culpa, you're quite right. I equate Win2k with NT, and don't
consider them as Windoze. 'Course Win2k and NT are inherently
insecurable too ;>>
--
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay
