"It's also important to understand that there's no answers available from 
this list, only opinions.
Some of them just happen to be, or are intended to be helpful ;-}>"
*Tom Brinkman


On Wednesday 22 August 2001 19:20, Tim Holmes wrote:
> Well the only response to the message you sent was the best on.  The
> reason why I didn't respond to your post.
>
> The solutions that would cause the least amount of headaches would be to
> buy a REAL modem.  Even if you did get the WinModem working, you'd be
> sending posts asking why it disconnects like it does.  All because
> poorly written beta drivers for something never intended to run under a
> real operating system.
>
> But, just to humor you, since you seem to feel neglected at the lists
> "failure" to help you, I'll offer some help for your problem.
>
> You may need a newer and/or recompiled kernel to accept the module for
> your "modem."  Not knowing which version of Mandrake, or what kernel
> you're using, I couldn't speculate as to what is needed.
>
> When you found that your modem actually has a driver for Linux, still
> doesn't mean it will work for your machine, with your kernel, or even
> with Mandrake.
>
> Mandrake is becoming more and more popular, and more mainstreamed (As
> much as Linux can be at this point in time.) but those drivers were
> written and compiled for RedHat 6.2 or RedHat 7.0.  Maybe even Debian,
> so you may even need to compile the driver yourself in hopes of getting
> it to work under your Mandrake machine.  But let's not get into the
> state of mind where people think if there's a driver, especially beta,
> then it's supported under Linux.
>
> And this is a Users List.  Just because you post an question, doesn't
> mean it's going to be responded to.  If you don't get a response, try
> posting it to the EXPERT list.  Or try going to MandrakeCampus.com, or
> going through more doc pages.  I've posted quite a few questions to the
> board that nobody replies to.  Either they don't read it, or they have
> no clue on how to help.  Keep that in mind as well as take some
> recommendations with a grain of salt.  What worked for them, may not
> work for you.
>
> As well as any sort of formated text is the first kind of email to get
> deleted.  For those of us that use console based mailers like pine, elm,
> or mutt, HTML emails aren't worth the ~/.mailcap entry.
> tdh

----------------------------------------
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="message.footer"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 
----------------------------------------

-- 
It's also important to understand that there's no answers available from this 
list, only opinions.
Some of them just happen to be, or are intended to be helpful ;-}>
*Tom Brinkman

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://wwww.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to