On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Richard Fairhurst<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Do you think that tomorrow I need to look for a better editor? > > Honest reply? Yes, I do. More to the point, I think that, tomorrow or > today if possible, you need to recognise that we are all volunteers, > working in our free time, for the love of it. So yes, I'd rather it > was some other editor author, not me, spending the time to tell you > that, because then I can get on with something useful. And from the other side of the fence, thank you for making Potlatch, and all the hours that you put into squashing bugs, and adding new features. Others all the time talk about using a "better" or "more powerful" editor instead of Potlatch. I've tried other editors, and come back to Potlatch every time. Potlatch just works, and is so intuitive that I don't even know if there's a user manual for it. My GPS uses TeleAtlas as it's map database, and I find myself wishing that they had an interface like Potlatch which would allow users to submit requests for changes. Every change that I have submitted to TeleAtlas has been replied to with "Not enough information provided" type response. You only have a couple hundred characters to tell them what the problem is, which can be difficult to convey. Draw a picture, and it's easily understood. I'd be hard pressed to come up with requests for improvements to Potlatch. There's one thing that comes to mind, but that is because of the way the GeoBase information that we are importing is formatted. So, once again Richard, Thank you, thank you, thank you. Potlatch is MY editor of choice! James VE6SRV _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
