On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 17:26 -0400, Bill Ricker wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Paul Johnson > <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/[email protected]> wrote: > > No, no it's not. By failing to split the original digest into original > > messages before replying, you destroy the In-Reply-To: references > > header. This breaks threads. > > having Subjects is better than nothing. It is possible to follow the > logical thread with subject sort or next by subject in most tool-sets.
Really? Microsoft Outlook does this, but everything else including gmail does it the right way.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
