Aspen Swartz wrote: > Anyhow, I think we can use the "living street" tag where it seems to > fit more or less, and not disqualify some streets because in > municipality X, fire trucks are allowed on living streets and in > municipality Y they aren't. My take on the generalized meaning of > "living street" is a street that is not for cars, whether cars are > strictly prohibited or just strongly discriminated against. That is > partly because I don't see any other tags that mean that.
Thank you! That's what I meant by "culturally equivalent" in my other post regarding living streets and bicycle boulevards. Now, I could be wrong (I'm on Amtrak right now and can't do a quick once-over on the wiki), but there's no widely accepted tag for a bicycle boulevard. There is, however, a tag that means "this street has been severely gamed to make it uncomfortable for motorists for the benefit of nonmotorized use." If it's only intended for travel to local destinations, highlighting this fact with access=destination would be more appropriate than trying to declare that we're out of synch with Europe (yes, we know...thanks for sending us your best and brightest in the 1700s to start the party!). _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
