This was discussed a while back and I don't think there is a consensus. There are cases where having a common way for the road and the landuse area does cause problems e.g. in more detailed mapping (which often comes later than the original creation of the common way with shared nodes) that wants to show features that arise from the real-life finite (non-zero) width of the road without implying that the land-use (e.g. farm) applies to the road. At its worst, there are cases where the landuse occupies a single polygon with roads running through it.
SO ... I would defer to the poser of the original question - if (s)he thinks it is worth doing (and it is so much easier on JOSM isn't it!) then it is probably worth doing ... Mike Harris > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Bennett [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 12 January 2010 02:14 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSM-newbies] Ungluing in Potlatch > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Molescott > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Until I'm more experienced and confident with JOSM, I > mostly use Potlatch but don't know how to separate landuse - > road - landuse where they share common nodes. > > > > I can do it in JOSM but as I'm mainly in Potlatch I've been > darting between the two just to separate areas, which seems a > bit silly. > > Not sure if this is equivalent to what Andre said, but you can press - > (minus) to remove a node from just one way. > > Also...is this really a worthwhile task? What's wrong with > landuse tags sharing nodes with roads? That's how I've been > creating them, it seems a lot tidier than having a whole > separate polygon just inside the road network. Is there > really any strong consensus against doing that? > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
