First, my apologies for misunderstanding the situation. I should have looked closer at the Bing imagery - I didn't see the medians. >> 1) It renders badly. In every renderer. Spurious one-way arrows, the >> road comes out looking wider, you get the extra lines down the middle, >> ugly intersections... > > I think one could be argued that one should not omit for the renderer.
If anyone made that argument I would vigorously point out that: a) "don't tag for the renderer" is a guideline applied in specific circumstances, not an axiom. b) when *every* renderer behaves a certain way, it's not "tagging for the renderer", it's "tagging for renderers", or in common language, "mapping". c) the "don't tag for the renderer" guideline applies in situations where it's likely that support for more appropriate tags will be added in the foreseeable future. We're a long way from that point with this kind of sub-road-level stuff. But once again, my bad, sorry for creating noise. Steve _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
