On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> wrote: > There are debates about the appropriateness of such data, similar to > classifying a neighborhood "dangerous". > > It's not ground verifiable; it's subjective, and does not really > belong in OSM IMHO.
In Australia, at least, the list of such locations is maintained by a government agency. Inclusion on that list is thus objective. Some of them are "ground verifiable" by the presence of a sign (although in general the sign goes up after they fix the problem...) Steve _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
