On Windows 95, 98, and Me the hosts file is located in c:\windows.  
 
Best,
 
Tony
 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dave Christensen 
Sent: Mon 6/30/2003 12:48 PM 
To: 'Newbie Help' 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [newbies] /etc/hosts



        Is there an equivalent to /etc/hosts for Windows? I want to be able
        access my local RH9 box from my Windows 2000 and Windows 98SE machines
        without typing 192.168.*.*
        
        Thanks,
        
        Dave
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        On Behalf Of Michael Torrie
        Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 1:22 AM
        To: Newbie Help
        Subject: Re: [newbies] /etc/hosts
        
        On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 01:07, John Noll wrote:
        > I really appreciate all the help.
        >
        > I'm just not understaniding the naming schemes for linux.  My
        /etc/hosts
        > file looks like this right now:
        >
        > # Do not remove the following line, or various programs
        > # that require network functionality will fail.
        > 127.0.0.1       localhost.localdomain   localhost
        >
        > What should my /etc/hosts file look like if I want my computer to be
        > named john.example.net?  Do I need to specify an ip address?  What
        would
        > the command be or am I just as well to do the changes in the redhat
        gui
        > for network configuration?
        
        You have to understand that the name "john.example.net" is only the name
        of your computer to others when you have it in a DNS server somewhere.
        For example, my machine at work is called isengard, and it's
        fully-qualified name is isengard.chem.byu.edu.  But that really only
        means anything to other computers because our DNS points isengard to my
        ip address.  All hosts does is give your local machine a quick way to
        resolve simple names that aren't in anyone's DNS.  For example, my home
        machine's host file looks like:
        
        127.0.0.1       enterprise.local.lan    enterprise    
        localhost.localdomain  localhost
        192.168.0.1     reliant.local.lan       reliant
        192.168.0.2     enterprise
        192.168.0.3     saratoga
        192.168.0.4     stargazer.local.lan     stargazer
        192.168.0.5     intrepid
        192.168.0.6     hood
        192.168.0.7     voyager
        192.168.0.8     defiant
        192.168.0.11    vpn-tgt
        192.168.0.10    vpn-src
        192.168.0.12    sparc1
        192.168.0.14    pegasus
        192.168.0.30    marcus
        192.168.0.32    marcuslaptop
        
        None of my machines are on a DNS, (I could set on up if I wanted to, I
        guess), so I put these in /etc/hosts so that *my* machine can reference
        the others by name.  If the other machines want to reference my machine,
        they would need similar /etc/hosts entries.
        
        Note that your computer can have a real ip address and no hostname
        (other than localhost).  However it could still have a name in a DNS
        somewhere.  Basically, whatever I set the hostname (during setup or in
        /etc/sysconfig/network) to I add to the 127.0.0.1 line for convenience.
        
        This probably is way confusing, but I'm not sure how to explain it
        simpler.  :)
        
        Yes I really do have that many machines.  Sort of.  Reliant is my
        firewall (on at&T cable), enterprise is my workstation, saratoga is my
        i-opener (remember those?), stargazer is my brother's workstation, and
        intrepid, hood, voyager and defiant are all virtual machines (VMWare and
        User-mode-linux).  Pegasus is my attempt at building a PVR (see
        www.mythtv.org).  Oh and the sparc1 entry is for my 25 Mhz black and
        white Sparcstation ELC (runs diskless with an nfs-root and 1-bpp X
        display!!).  Gotta show off my toys.
        
        Michael
        
        
        >
        > Let's say I have two computers that will be talking to each other at
        > times.  I want one to be called 'john.example.net' and the other
        > 'tim.example.net'.  Is that the right idea or should they be totally
        > different like 'john.example.net' and tim.home.net'?
        >
        > Thank you,
        >
        > john
        >
        >
        > _______________________________________________
        > newbies mailing list
        > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies
        
        _______________________________________________
        newbies mailing list
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        newbies mailing list
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies
        

<<winmail.dat>>

_______________________________________________
newbies mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies

Reply via email to