http://www.kavkaz.org/eng/article.php?id=1422
Immorality of Western civilization
By the end of the 20th century the mankind has been informed about the
upcoming establishment of the New World Order. Implementation of the
Constitution of the new global economy is coming up under the auspices
of the so-called <Multilateral Investments Agreement>. The agreement is
supposed to defend the interests of transnational corporations, while
undermining the sovereignty of nations and providing the corporations
with the same rights that the countries where they are located have.
New global morality has been formed and is being announced. In other
words, market economy is trying to become market ideology, it is now
functioning as a doctrine, as a worldview, and sometimes it even
acquires religious meaning. For the first time at the turn of the
century the worldwide financial mafia has openly declared its right and
desire to form the world government the way it pleases.
Incompetence of governments of all countries around the world has
thereby been shown, - incompetence in managing agriculture, as well as
their inability to harmoniously set up the so-called world economy,
which speaks about the acknowledgement of <the only true> doctrine, the
concept that has been leading the development of the West over the past
millennia.
Let's open up the Bible. <You shall not lend upon interest to your
brother, interest on money, interest on victuals, interest on anything
that is lent for interest. To a foreigner you may lend upon interest,
but to your brother you shall not lend upon interest; that the LORD your
God may bless you in all that you undertake in the land which you are
entering to take possession of it>. Deuteronomy, chapter 23, 19-20.
It would be good to see what the most famous American banker David
Rockefeller said about the well-known Trilateral Commission. While
expressing his gratitude to chiefs of mass media and big-name magazines
for the caution in covering the activities of his organization, which in
turn has been implementing its projects for the past 40 years, D.
Rockefeller said the following:
Today's world is more perfect and more predisposed to the creation of
the united world government. Supranational power of intellectual elite
and worldwide bankers is more preferable than the right of nations to
self-determination, which we have been following for centuries.
But while blaming national governments in relentlessly approaching
global biosphere/ecological catastrophe, let's ask ourselves: aren't the
intentions to create the legal World Government, allegedly able to bring
the world to harmony, a sort of an attempt to turn to an open
dictatorship of some <supranational group>, after the world saw the
failure of the previous <democratic> government model?
And aren't the plans of the <new world order> and recently announced new
defense doctrine of the US (just as all actions of the US
Administration) a de-facto acknowledgement of the end of the period of
so-called democracy around the world?
The global economy itself, which gentlemen from the Bilderberg Club,
Trilateral Commission and other similar organizations are authorized and
are claiming to manage, has been formed in the 20th century, when the
volume of commodity turnover in the international trade of the majority
of the states became proportional to the commodity turnover or their
internal trade. The global economy was developed based on the economies
of regional civilizations of the planet, the economies of the states. At
the same time in various countries, in various regional civilizations, -
Western/Biblical, Islamic, Chinese, Indian - they had a different view
on what was permissible and what was not in the economic activities on
the level of micro- and macro economy.
Because of its advanced (compared to other regions of the planet) growth
of productive powers, the Western/Biblical regional civilization ended
up in a role of an architect of the global economic system. Its core,
the so-called <West> is rich not because the West is smarter, more
intellectual or more spiritual than <the East> or <the South>, but
because it is building its social system on a principle of a maximum
material advantage, which can be drawn from social and natural
potential, from exploiting human and natural resources of the rest of
the world. This is a manifestation of viciousness of Western lifestyle.
According to the report of UN Independent Commission on Population and
Quality of Life for 1998, the world is unable to withstand the Western
level of consumption. If 7 billion people would have been consuming the
same amount of energy and other resources that industrialized countries
are today, then five more planets the size of the Earth would have been
required to satisfy the needs of every individual (according to the
research conducted in Norway in 1994).
<Western Civilization's> experience in robbing and exploiting the Third
World countries and its economic <theories> are offered to the rest of
the world as more perfect and thereby universal. It is these thievish
theories that turned out to be the most widespread and indisputable in
the modern world. Even though because of the Biblical civilization and
its economic activities global economic crisis and total
biosphere/ecological crisis are impending over the entire planet and
over all its inhabitants.
Moreover, this advanced development of production of the Western
Civilization is advanced not only compared to other regions of the
planet, but also compared to the development of social morals and ethics
of the Western society itself. The West is degrading morally, its
industry is supporting the vicious system of social relations that bring
a man down to the status of a plough cattle, regardless of all ideals of
freedom, human rights, etc. proclaimed my <humanists and liberals>. And
nothing shows that the tendency in the development of the West will
change.
It is impossible to believe in the beneficence of such slave owning,
even if it's highly cultured and civilized, and not primitive or savage.
What is more humane: <mental repressions>, <economic terror>, or
<physical repressions> as an incentive of industrial development during
Socialism?
There was a reason why Prime Minister of Malaysia Mahathir Mohamad made
a generalization, when the aggravation of global financial crisis
happened in Southeast Asia in the fall of 1997.
Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said: <do not expect that we will run
our own societies for the welfare of somebody else, especially those who
would like to get huge profits on our stock markets>, and . <Soros is a
Jew and we, the Muslims, are his victims>.
Carthage must be destroyed! EX ORIENTE LUX - light is coming from the
East.
Sergei Alekseev,
for Kavkaz Center
2002-10-19 02:03:38
Serbian News Network - SNN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antic.org/
