If you are unable to view html within your email program please use the following link 
to view Chuck Muth's latest News and Views: http://chuckmuth.com/newsandviews/nv.cfm
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.chuckmuth.com/remove
X-ListMember: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I�M (ALMOST) BAAAACK!

Taking time off now and then is good for the soul, good for the heart and good for the 
mind.  But I expect to be back in the swing of things full-time again very soon.  
There will be changes...some minor, some major...but all for the better, of course.  
Unless, that is, you�re a liberal...or a lockstep compassionate conservative GOP 
partisan (uh-oh).  In the meantime, here�s a special edition of News & Views to hold 
you over a wee bit longer...

BONANZA FOR POLITICAL JUNKIES

Don�t know if I mentioned this before going on vacation, but our friend Rodney Helm in 
Vegas found a website which houses presidential campaign television commercials dating 
all the way back to Ike.  A real blast from the past.  Check it out at:

http://livingroomcandidate.movingimage.us/index.php

INQUIRING MINDS WANNA KNOW

�These (9-11 Commission) hearings amount to nothing more than current government 
officials meeting with former government officials, many of whom now lobby government 
officials, and agreeing that we need more government! The current and past architects 
of the very bureaucracy that failed Americans so badly on September 11th three years 
ago are now meeting to recommend more bureaucracy. Why on earth do we assume that 
former government officials, some of whom are self-interested government lobbyists, 
suddenly become wise, benevolent, and politically neutral when they retire?  Why do we 
look to former bureaucrats to address a bureaucratic failure?�

- Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), �Texas Straight Talk,� 8/23/04

DUMB & DUMBER

�When I was a kid and my parents started talking about politics, I'd run to my room 
and put on the Rolling Stones as loud as I could. So when I see all these rock stars 
up there talking politics, it makes me sick.  If you're listening to a rock star in 
order to get your information on who to vote for, you're a bigger moron than they are. 
Why are we rock stars? Because we're morons. We sleep all day, we play music at night 
and very rarely do we sit around reading the Washington Journal."

- Rock star Alice Cooper

OOPS...KERRY CAUGHT PULLING A GORE

�I remember well April 1968--I was serving in Vietnam--a place of violence--when the 
news reports brought home to me and my crewmates the violence back home--and the 
tragic news that one of the bullets flying that terrible spring took the life of that 
unabashedly maladjusted citizen.�

- John Kerry in a 2003 speech commemorating Martin Luther King Day.  Problem is, Kerry 
didn�t go to Vietnam until NOVEMBER of 1968.  Guess he doesn�t remember April of �68 
so well after all.

IN DEFENSE OF NEGATIVE ADVERTISING

�What in the world is wrong with giving a voter a reason why he should not vote for a 
candidate?� It's �negative� for me to tell you that you might not want to vote for 
Kerry because he's going to raise your taxes, or that you might not want to vote for 
Bush because he pandered to Ted Kennedy on education spending?  In any political 
campaign there are both reasons why you should vote FOR one candidate as well as 
reasons why you should NOT VOTE FOR another.� These are all valid issues to be brought 
before the voters. . .so spare us any further whining about �negative� advertising.�

- Talk show host Neal Boortz

GETTING WHAT HE ASKED FOR

�It was John Kerry, not the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, who picked this fight.  
Kerry was the one who made his long-ago stint in Vietnam the centerpiece of his 
campaign for president.� He's the one whose running mate urges voters to take Kerry's 
measure by spending �three minutes with the men who served with him 30 years ago.�� 
He's the one whose campaign ads dwell on his combat heroics.� He's the one who has 
repeatedly played the Vietnam card against critics and opponents.� And he's the one 
who challenged anyone �who wants to have a debate about our service in Vietnam to 
bring it on.�

�So the Swifties brought it on.�

- Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby

FREE SPEECH FOR ME, BUT NOT FOR THEE

�The (527) groups that have lately been portrayed as 'shadowy' and suspicious are 
ultimately nothing more than citizens of varying levels of political sophistication 
who want a say in the process. Politicians are the last people on Earth who should be 
allowed to 'crack down' and regulate the groups that exist expressly to challenge and 
defeat them.�

- Seattle Times columnist Collin Levey

REPEAL McCAIN-FEINGOLD?  BRING...IT...ON!

�If 527 organizations that are allowed to spend unlimited sums for political 
advertising are so bad why doesn�t some member of congress introduce legislation 
repealing the ghastly McCain/Feingold campaign finance reform act which resulted in 
the formation of the 527s.�

- Lyn Nofziger, �Musings,� 8/25/04

HIGH COST OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

A new study from the Center for Immigration Studies is one of the first to estimate 
the impact of illegal immigration on the federal budget. Based on Census Bureau data, 
the study estimates that households headed by illegal aliens used $10 billion more in 
government services than they paid in taxes in 2002. These figures are only for the 
federal government; costs at the state and local level are also likely to be 
significant. The study also finds that if illegals were given amnesty, the fiscal 
deficit at the federal level would grow to nearly $29 billion.  The study, entitled 
The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget, is online at 
http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscal.html

THE PARTY OF BIG GOVERNMENT

�Once upon a time, the Republican Party stood for fiscal responsibility and limited 
government.  That fantasy world disappeared long ago.

�A House-Senate conference committee is considering legislation to hand billions to 
tobacco producers and extend Food and Drug Administration rules to cigarettes.  
President Bush seems prepared to accept anything that passes.  More spending and 
regulation together: The GOP, no less than the Democrats, is the party of big 
government.�

- Doug Bandow of the Cato Institute

ALL HAT AND NO CATTLE

�When it came to controlling deficit spending last year, words were abundant but deeds 
were in short supply on Capitol Hill. . . . The phrases �fiscally responsible,� 
�fiscal discipline,� �fiscal responsibility,� �fiscal irresponsibility,� and �fiscally 
irresponsible� appeared 1,046 times in the 2003 Congressional Record, an increase of 
nearly 25 percent compared to the 1st Session of the previous Congress (2001).� 

�Yet, no one in Congress had a net voting record that would have cut overall 
discretionary spending�down from a high of 512 Members in 1996 (104th Congress). . . . 
All told, the average House Member voted for just 2 cents in spending cuts for every 
dollar in spending increases. Senators backed 5 cents in reductions for every dollar 
of increases.�

- Results of the Vote Tally study for 2003 by the National Taxpayers Union Foundation

MEANINGLESS AGENDA

�With John Kerry running no worse than even in most polls, many Republicans believe 
that Mr. Bush needs a big idea of some kind to galvanize his supporters.  I think they 
probably will be disappointed.  Very few presidents ever have a meaningful second-term 
agenda.�

- Columnist Bruce Bartlett

HERE�S �YOUR� PLATFORM: LOVE IT...OR ELSE!

�The (Republican Party) platform was written in secret and not delivered to the 100 
members of the platform committee until late Tuesday. Time for consideration of the 
platform was cut in half and the entire proceedings treated like a sensitive meeting 
of the Federal Reserve Board. Columnist Robert Novak, who has attended every opening 
reception of the GOP platform committee for a quarter century, found that the 
reception this year was held under police guard and he was denied admission.�

- John Fund, Political Diary, 8/26/04

FORKED-TONGUE PLATFORM

�(The GOP platform plank on illegal immigration is) Clintonlike doublespeak in a 
Republican platform: I'm against amnesty but let me define what amnesty is.  The 
president is wrong not to reach out to his base, which opposes amnesty. This pandering 
to Hispanic voters is going to get the president into more trouble than if he dealt 
with illegal immigration forthrightly.  I want the platform to oppose amnesty, Social 
Security benefits and driver's licenses for illegal aliens working in the United 
States.�

- Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, Washington Time, 8/26/04

WHERE SELDOM IS HEARD, A CONSERVATIVE WORD

�Late yesterday, the American Conservative Union obtained an advanced copy of the 2004 
draft Republican Platform. . . . Indeed, on first reading the word �conservative� does 
not even appear in the document, not even with the modifier �compassionate� as in the 
2000 Bush platform.�

- Richard Lessner, executive director for the American Conservative Union, 8/25/04     
 

WE�RE ALL BIG GOV�T CONSERVATIVES NOW

�The 2004 Republican Platform Committee finished its work this afternoon. It wasn't a 
pretty picture.  You have to give the Bush political operation credit: they badly 
outflanked the party conservatives. By the time delegates gathered here in New York 
for the platform committee work, the game was already over. The Bush operation made 
certain that the committee, selected by state parties, was packed with loyalists. Any 
chance of a conservative uprising over the platform was DOA.

�The most controversial plank in the draft platform was on immigration, specifically 
President Bush's proposal for a guest worker program for illegal aliens, a plan that 
also would put those who entered America unlawfully on the path to U.S. citizenship. 
This idea is wildly unpopular with grassroots Republicans and the Bush people know it. 
So the fix was in. Any effort by the handful of conservatives on the rubber-stamp 
platform committee to amend or delete the offending plank on immigration were trumped 
by a series of strong-arm tactics and procedural maneuverings.

�Not that the bullying tactics mattered much. The platform delegates comported 
themselves like a flock of obedient sheep. Taking their cues from committee 
co-chairmen Sen. Bill Frist and Colorado Gov. Bill Owens, delegates even rejected 
amendments drawn word-for-word from the 2000 GOP platform.

�While there is much in the platform to please conservatives, there is also plenty to 
infuriate. Just eight years after the GOP platform called for the abolition of the 
U.S. Department of Education, the 2004 platform boasts, �President Bush and 
Congressional Republicans have provided the largest increase in federal education 
funding in history and the highest percentage gain since the 1960s [only a last-minute 
amendment deleted a reference to LBJ at this point] ... Support for elementary and 
secondary education has had the largest increase in any single Presidential term since 
the 1960s � an increase of nearly 50 percent since 2001.�

�A Texas delegate, introducing an amendment to delete this mind-boggling big 
government boast, said it sounded like something out of the Democratic Platform rather 
than anything identifiably Republican. The amendment was overwhelmingly crushed.  And 
that's how it went here in New York. I guess it's true: We're all big government 
conservatives now.�

- Richard Lessner, executive director for the American Conservative Union, 8/26/04

CAN ANYONE FILL THIS VACUUM?

�I'm tired of sitting by and watching the morons who have destroyed what my Republican 
Party stood for for many years.� Too bad Libertarians are such nut cases because I 
believe the GOP has left me behind.� Ronald Reagan must be spinning in his grave.�

- News & Views reader Deanna Lowther

FAMOUS LAST WORDS

�Government is not the solution, it�s the problem.�

- Ronald Reagan

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Chuck Muth�s News & Views is published by Citizen Outreach, a non-partisan, 501(c)3 
non-profit corporation. The opinions and views expressed in Chuck Muth's News & Views 
reflect those of the writers, editors and columnists therein and do not necessarily 
reflect the opinions of Citizen Outreach, its officers, directors or employees.

Published by: Citizen Outreach
Chuck Muth
Editor/Publisher
611 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, #439
Washington, DC 20003-4303
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE, just go to:  http://www.chuckmuth.com/newsletter/

To be REMOVED, go to:
http://www.chuckmuth.com/remove/default.cfm

Or send your request to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To make a secure online contribution to Citizen Outreach, go to the �Donate� page at 
www.citizenoutreach.com.






Reply via email to