This morning's New York Times reports the stirrings of a very 
promising development:
a push for universal voter registration. (See below)

It's obvious that we need automatic registration; and it should be 
the states, and not
the federal government, that handles it. (Can you imagine how the 
Bush regime would
run the program?) So we should certainly applaud this 
conversation--and, of course,
take part in it.

And in so doing, we should press the point that any meaningful reform 
of our election
system must include some other measures, too.

Automatic registration would expand the franchise, and thereby make 
it harder to suppress
the vote. But what about the way our votes are cast--and counted?

What we need, first, is to get rid of all computerized systems, from 
the e-voting machines
and op-scans to the electronic voter rolls and central tabulators.

And this move must entail a ban on the participation of all private 
companies in our
elections.

If this is really a democracy, we cannot vote on, or have our ballots 
counted by, opaque
and insecure computer systems, managed by closed firms that are 
completely unaccountable,
and tend to have strong partisan connections. In short, we have to do 
away, as soon as
possible, with secret vote counts--which is now exactly what we have,

These are just a few important items on my "12-Step Program to Save 
US Democracy,"
which is in Loser Take All, and which you'll find attached here.

MCM

p.s. This 12-step program deals only with the mechanics of our 
elections--not with
other, equally imporant measures that we need to push for, too. 
Certainly, we need
real campaign finance reform, and (this will be a tough one) 
proportional representation,
so that we can finally break up the duopoly maintained by the two 
major parties.

And we need sweeping media reform as well, so that We the People can find out
what's really going on, and hear those voices that the press now 
pointedly excludes.


November 7, 2008

Push to Expand Voter Rolls
and Early Balloting in U.S.
By IAN URBINA

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/us/politics/07voting.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Many of the states that allowed early voting this year experienced 
few delays on Election Day, and now federal election officials, 
lawmakers and voting experts say people in every state should have 
the same privilege.

There is also increasing support for broadly expanding voter 
registration rolls, possibly by having the federal government require 
the states to make registration automatic for all eligible voters. 
Supporters say universal registration could reduce registration fraud 
and the confusion at the polls that results when voters are purged 
from the rolls.

Such a plan would be costly and technologically difficult, and it 
could run into resistance from Republicans who have been wary of 
expanding registration, citing concerns about ineligible voters being 
added to the rolls. Some state officials say they would prefer to set 
registration standards themselves.

But independent experts say easier registration and voting methods 
would ensure that huge crowds like those on Tuesday turn out without 
being discouraged by the long delays experienced in many states.

"The single most important thing that Congress can do right now is 
create universal voter registration, which would mean that all 
eligible voters are automatically registered," said Rosemary E. 
Rodriguez, the chairwoman of the federal Election Assistance 
Commission, which oversees voting. "We also saw incredible success 
with early voting, and requiring states to adopt it would help as 
well."

Ms. Rodriguez said universal registration would reduce the dependence 
on third-party groups like Acorn to sign up people and would remove 
the impetus for much of the pre-election litigation over who should 
be allowed to register.
Congress is already discussing the adoption of early voting 
nationwide. It now exists in 32 states in various forms.

A bill to do so was drafted last year by Senator Dianne Feinstein, 
Democrat of California, and its co-sponsors included Senator Barack 
Obama, Democrat of Illinois. The bill was tabled after receiving 
little support from Congressional Republicans but is likely to have a 
better chance next year when Democrats hold expanded majorities on 
Capitol Hill and Mr. Obama is president.

Early voting proved extraordinarily successful in providing people 
with more options to cast their ballot and in easing the strain of 
turnout on Election Day. It gave voters the chance to clarify their 
eligibility before Election Day, and it gave election officials more 
time to test and understand new machines and rules.
Legislation to expand registration, most likely to be introduced in 
the coming months, may be tougher to pass.

"A system of automatic registration, in which the government bears 
more of the responsibility for assembling accurate and secure lists 
of eligible voters, is a necessary reform," Senator Hillary Rodham 
Clinton of New York, who is working on legislation intended to 
overhaul how eligible voters register, said Thursday. "All eligible 
Americans should be able to cast their ballot without barriers, and 
the registration problems we saw on Tuesday and during the weeks that 
preceded Election Day make clear that the system needs improvement."

There are several possible methods of achieving universal 
registration with different roles for the states and the federal 
government.

Lawyers from the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York 
University School of Law, as well as other voting rights groups 
working with Mrs. Clinton on her legislation, said they had been 
pushing a proposal to leave control of the lists at the state level.

Their plan would require states to expand the voter registration 
databases that have already been created so that they include all 
eligible voters. To do this, states would draw information from tax 
records, driver's license lists and social service agencies. The plan 
would also require states to update registrations whenever voters 
filed an address change with the Postal Service or other government 
agency, so the 14 percent or more of voters who move every year do 
not fall off the rolls.

Richard L. Hasen, an election law expert at Loyola Law School in Los 
Angeles, has pushed for a more ambitious plan in which the federal 
government would build a national database of registered voters.

"We could minimize long lines, lower the amount of election-law 
litigation and bolster public confidence in the process of running 
our elections if we turned over the job of voter registration to the 
federal government," Dr. Hasen said. "If the feds were charged with 
registering every eligible voter, then concerns about voter 
registration fraud, database mismatches and provisional ballots would 
be seriously reduced."

Arguments for and against such plans are very likely to fall along 
partisan lines, with most support coming from Democrats.

Lorraine C. Minnite, a political science professor and voting rights 
expert at Barnard College, said Republicans had generally resisted 
such efforts in part out of concern about ineligible voters like 
noncitizens being permitted to vote.

"But the bigger reason that Republicans have resisted expanding the 
franchise," Dr. Minnite said, "is that the new people who are likely 
to come into the electorate are more often of lower income and are 
people of color, who tend to vote Democratic."

Tom Jensen, a Democratic pollster based in Raleigh, N.C., said early 
voting gave Mr. Obama the edge for his narrow victory in North 
Carolina by offering his campaign more time to organize rides and get 
people to the polls. Mr. Jensen noted that Mr. Obama won early 
balloting by 178,000 votes but lost among Election Day voters by 
165,000 votes.
"Obama had a great ground game," he said, "but if you only have 13 
hours to get everyone out, it's much harder."

R. Doug Lewis, director of the National Association of Election 
Officials, a nonpartisan group that represents local and state 
election officials, said his members saw this as a "state's rights 
issue" and were not thrilled about any possible federal takeover of 
registration or new laws that required early voting. But Mr. Lewis 
said they would support legislation that gave states incentives to 
help achieve these goals.

Most state election officials see the merit in early voting, Mr. 
Lewis said, and have become frustrated by dealing with voter 
registrations being submitted by third-party organizations, often in 
duplicate or with errors. He said state officials believed that they 
could do a better job than Washington in deciding how to keep the 
lists accurate and whether to expand them.

But how states maintain and verify their lists has become a serious 
problem and led to many lawsuits around the country. Before the 
election, Colorado, Louisiana and Michigan were found to have wrongly 
removed thousands of voters from their rolls.

The Election Protection Hotline received more than 20,000 reports 
from states like California, Georgia, New York and Pennsylvania of 
voters who showed up at the polls to find they were not on the rolls. 
The only option for them was to cast a provisional ballot, which is 
not recorded if poll workers cannot find a matching 
voter-registration record.

In Missouri, the secretary of state, Robin Carnahan, agreed that 
changes were needed.
Because of long lines and confusion, "there were some people in our 
state who couldn't vote, and it's heartbreaking to hear their 
stories," said Ms. Carnahan, a Democrat. "Early voting would have 
solved a lot of that."

She added that while she would resist federal control over voter 
registration, she would support incentives for states to broaden 
participation and federal steps to make the process more uniform.
Katharine Q. Seelye and Sean D. Hamill contributed reporting.

Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company
        *       Privacy Policy Search Corrections RSS First Look Help 
Contact Us Work for Us Site Map

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Attachment: 12-Step Program 1.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Reply via email to